Urology. 2004 Apr;63(4):716-21.
Long-term pooled
analysis of multicenter studies of cooled
thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia
results at three months through four years.
Trock BJ, Brotzman M, Utz WJ, Ugarte RR, Kaplan SA,
Larson TR, Blute ML, Roehrborn
CG, Partin AW.
Division of Epidemiology, Brady Urological Institute, Johns
Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, USA.
OBJECTIVES: To determine
the long-term efficacy of cooled thermotherapy in the treatment of lower urinary
tract symptoms of clinical benign prostatic
hyperplasia.
METHODS: A total of 541
men underwent cooled thermotherapy treatment in six multicenter
studies in the United States, England, and Canada. Both fixed and random
effects models were used to pool the data across the six studies. The treatment
response was measured as the difference between the urinary tract symptoms at
baseline versus those at 3, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months after therapy. The
treatment response included changes in the American Urological Association
Symptom Score (AUA symptom score), peak urinary flow rate in milliliters per
second (Qmax), and quality of life (QOL).
RESULTS: The baseline
measures were comparable across the studies. At 3 months, the AUA symptom score
had improved by a mean of 11.6 (55%), Qmax by a mean
of 4.0 (51%), and QOL by a mean of 2.3 (53%). These changes persisted with only
slight attenuation through 48 months (corresponding mean changes of 43%, 35%,
and 50%). These changes were highly statistically significant (P <0.0001 to
0.01). An improvement of at least 25% was achieved for the AUA symptom score
and QOL by more than 85% of men and by more than 65% of men for Qmax. CONCLUSIONS:
This pooled analysis of six multicenter studies of
cooled thermotherapy, involving 541 men, found highly significant improvements
in AUA symptom score, Qmax, and QOL. The results were
highly consistent across the studies. The improvements reflected changes from
baseline values of 45% to 50% for AUA symptom score and QOL and 35% to 40% for Qmax at a follow-up duration up to 48 months after therapy.
The level of improvement for all three measures remained high at 48 months,
indicating that the response is durable.