This page is being served from the Urological Sciences Research Foundation web repository, and was originally posted between 1996-2008. In January 2009 USRF’s founder, Dr. Leonard S. Marks and his staff joined UCLA’s Department of Urology where they are continuing their research. Click for more information.
The 10 Great Foibles of PSA Testing
|
||||
This special report was stimulated in part by two recent reports, denoting changes in prostate cancer over the past 2 decades and helping to establish certain limitations on the current use of PSA testing. The 2 pivotal articles are: T. A. Stamey, et al.The Prostate Specific Antigen Era in the U.S. is Over for Prostate Cancer: What Happened in the Last 20 Years J.Urol. 172: 1297, 2004. Conclusion: Serum PSA levels are no longer related to prostate cancer, but only to the volume of BPH present. There is an urgent need for a better serum marker! I. M. Thompson, et al.Operating Characteristics of Prostate-Specific Antigen in Men with an Initial PSA Level of 3.0 ng/ml or Lower. JAMA 294:66, 2005. Conclusion: There is no cutpoint of PSA with simultaneous high sensitivity and high specificity for monitoring healthy men for prostate cancer, but rather a continuum of prostate cancer risk at all values of PSA. |
||||
|
|